Articles on Franklin Halves
I was wondering about the PCGS /NGC population of Franklin Halves and how it has changed over time. So I looked at 2002 and 2008 populations for comparison. The results were interesting. I used the MS65 and MS65FBL totals from both NGC and PCGS. And I used 10 of the scarcest dates of the 35 coin series. Here it is:
| Date | 2002 pop. total | 2008 pop. total | % gain |
| 1949-D | 375 | 649 | 73% |
| 1950-D | 493 | 1188 | 140% |
| 1951-D | 615 | 990 | 60% |
| 1960-D | 676 | 1043 | 54% |
| 19 52-D | 732 | 1120 | 53% |
| 1953-D | 827 | 1389 | 67% |
| 1953-P | 832 | 1200 | 44% |
| 1961-D | 855 | 1345 | 57% |
| 1949-P | 947 | 1375 | 45% |
| 1962-P | 984 | 1437 | 46% |
The average gain for these 10 coins is 59%. The population of gem Franklins is growing. Being a relativly modern series there are a lot of coins yet to be certified as old collections come onto the market. However, the quality of Frankilns coming out of the mint was subpar. The vast majority have too many bagmarks and/or milkspots to grade MS65. Also, they were stored in rolls which sometimes caused roll friction on the high points of the coin.
Gem Franklins are still quite affordable. Collectors can readily find them in many different locations.